Talk:2006 Tri Nations Series

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rugby union C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Description

Should we adda small description of the matches, maybe next t o the wikinews link, like a short paragraph? Cvene64 05:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really think so, because then people will complain about P.O.V., unless we reference well.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 10:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pitch background

Maybe we should kind of wash over the pitch colour with white, or a faded pattern or something, as the Springbok jersey needs to be alot darker, as, as it stands, it could be confusing with Ireland. Thoughts? Cvene64 08:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Yeah, but make sure you change the blank image to, which can be found in those images cats.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 08:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]

Actually, just leave because Ireland aint in the Tri Nations, so there is minimal chance of confusion. Also, when Ireland plays RSA, usally, one plays in white, meaning it doesn't really matter.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 21:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pitch text

I believe the text should be in white because it is difficult to view the black text at the moment. Jpe|ob 05:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then change it, cos I aint, it takes ages to fiddle around with that stuff.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 05:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a passing reader - if nobody changes it then you may as well remove it because I cannot read it. Ga rr ie 04:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the thing is impossible to read Outside Center 03:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Logo

Which logo? The current one or this one: Image:Tri Nations Rugby Union logo.PNG?--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 06:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't edit for a weekend

And I come back on wiki and see poor, unsourced edits. If you add the scores, add the images and other such what. Where are the references? This was good quality a week ago!--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 09:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tri Nations.jpg

Image:Tri Nations.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]