Talk:2007–08 Rangers F.C. season

Football: Scotland / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Scottish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Beasley

Since when was Beasley confirmed? --Sparhelda 20:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See here if you're registered. WATP ^(talk) • _(contribs) 15:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well obviously i know hes confirmed now. It was before when someone has him as signed before it had actually been announced. :P Sparhelda 20:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I replied after he was confirmed, thinking you had enquired after he was confirmed. How confusing. WATP ^(talk) • _(contribs) 01:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add the above template to the season articles for navigational purposes? - Dudesleeper · Talk 15:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a good idea. Maybe also a Current season link on it to this page? WATP ^(talk) • _(contribs) 15:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixtures and Results

I don't like how they have been seperated into different tables for each individual competition. I much prefer when they are in one table simply as it's easier to see the results in chronological order.

Thoughts anyone? Rfc scott (talk) 21:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the other table was long, difficult to follow and sinfully ugly. Chronologically it was superior but that was its only positive. The new tables enable users to view the competitions competed for, distinguish a win from a loss or a drawn match and also view attendance figures. Yatesy1988 (talk) 21:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not be presumptuous

Adding but hiding the Scottish Cup Final fixture before the club had reached it is a little disrespectful and bigoted. Let's not do that again. - Dudesleeper / Talk 16:55, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see Aberdeen were added to the final by Yatesy before QoS sent them packing. Slow learner, obviously... - Dudesleeper / Talk 17:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a large portion of humble pie after that result! Still i think there is nothing wrong with adding the fixtures/dates for ease of reference, although leave opponents out Yatesy1988 (talk) 23:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But then you're assuming that they'll reach the final, or whatever forthcoming rounds you're adding. The superstitious amongst us might frown upon that. - Dudesleeper / Talk 23:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why is it bigoted?? think you need to get the dictionary out... 77.97.110.57 (talk) 13:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Layout

Is there any reason this page isn't like the page for next season which has already been made, it looks really good? Rfc scott (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beasley

{{Rangers F.C.}}

Fixtures and Results

Let's not be presumptuous

Layout