Talk:2007 in hip hop music

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled 2007 comment

i want this page to be a history of hip hop in 2007, an overlook at the industry for those who listen to the music and watch the industry.Knowledgeman66 16:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 17.07 8 July 2007[reply]

Citing sales sources

Please cite the sales sources as well as chart positions. These figures are most likely available at the RIAA and Billboard websites. Sokmonkey77 22:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I understand that the page creator wants this to be a history of hip hop in 2007, but I think it should be merged with 2007 in music because if we have this page, we ought to have 2007 in country music, 2007 in polka, 2007 in rock music, etc. Not a lot of references either, that should be fixed if you want this page to stay. Conman33 19:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, hip hop is big enough in this year to have it's own article about the year. West Coast Ryda 10:02, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The creator says: how about changing it from 2007 in hip hop to hip hop timeline. My intention was to document hip hop events and history, that would do just as well. Does anyone have interest in helping out? Knowledgeman66 15:54 19 October 2007

There has to be a big 50 cent fan here. He is trying to make 50 cent's sales higher. 50 cent's 2nd album sold 1.14 million copies on its first week not 1.4 million. Also Kanye West's 2nd album sold 5 million copies worldwide not 3 million copies.Upol007 (talk) 13:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not Yet Updated!

This page was nominated for deletion on 1 November 2009. The result of discussion was to keep it. So when is this going to be updated? Those interested in mending not ending this article should step up and mend it. Even those who voted to keep admit it's poorly done. Also Hiphop is not just about who charted during the year. What did Heiroglyphics and other major independent hiphoppas do in 2007? Wack history is worse than no history. This page should be nominated for deletion if not updated by 1 November 2010. Hierowritarohseht (talk) 20:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2007 in hip hop music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140915012320/http://www.hitsdailydouble.com/sales/salescht.cgi to http://www.hitsdailydouble.com/sales/salescht.cgi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]