Talk:2008 Chinese Grand Prix/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Good job on producing a high-quality article that is well-referenced and has good pictures to illustrate itself, but some parts are still missing references.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Information inside the Infobox, such as course and distance, need references.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Pretty stable
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Guideline not applicable. All are free images, no concern.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Awaiting improvements. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Done, I often forget to do the infobox. The info about pole position and placings is covered in the sourced "Classification" section, fastest lap is covered in prose. Apterygial 23:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Well done. It's now GA. This beats the fastest lap in the time of on-hold articles =) OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Yep. My computer is a $100m windtunnel :). Thanks for the review. Apterygial 01:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)