Talk:2011 Campeonato Brasileiro Série A
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Standings Table
[edit]A question for anyone that can answer this for me. I'm not totally up on what the Brazilian Federation considers a tie breaker for there League Table, but I thought it was goal differential. Both Sao Paulo/Internacional and Fluminese/Cruziero are tied on points and the lower goal differential are higher on the table. What gives? Birdy (talk) 02:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- When tied on points, the first tie breaker is wins. Digirami (talk) 01:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 Campeonato Brasileiro Série A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516234123/http://www.cbf.com.br/competicoes/campeonato-brasileiro/serie-a/2011 to http://www.cbf.com.br/competicoes/campeonato-brasileiro/serie-a/2011
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516234123/http://www.cbf.com.br/competicoes/campeonato-brasileiro/serie-a/2011 to http://www.cbf.com.br/competicoes/campeonato-brasileiro/serie-a/2011
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)