Talk:2016 IFK Göteborg season

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Sweden / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Swedish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Key Events[edit]

Shouldn't we have unique key events on different rows, even if they occurs on the same date? I have to options, in which I prefer the first one.

1)

31 March 2016: Director of sports Mats Gren is announced as new caretaker club director.

Midfielder Mauricio Albornoz joins the club on a loan deal until 1 July 2016, transferring from Åtvidabergs FF.

2)

31 March 2016: Director of sports Mats Gren is announced as new caretaker club director.
31 March 2016: Midfielder Mauricio Albornoz joins the club on a loan deal until 1 July 2016, transferring from Åtvidabergs FF.

// Psemmler (talk) 18:31, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, if I have to choose I would take alternative 2. But I think a "Summary"-section containing prose (of course with sources) would be even better. Qed237 (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also like number 2 better, but the way it is works for me. A "Summary"-section will turn up when I (or any other who feel compelled) has the time. But that will not include "Key events", but rather how the club has played in all different competitions, kind of like this. I actually like the pretty official and stiff "Key events"-section, to put all of that in prose would be to messy in my opinion. // Mattias321 (talk)

I think my English is lacking to do a summary section, but maybe I can help later on, I don't know at the moment. About the key events, I like the section, but just as your example of the Malmö FF season Reckless made, it look so much better with different rows for unique key events. // Psemmler (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]