Talk:2020 Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly election

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Addition of new part

@Abbasi786786 please add Balawaristan National Front and a party under heading of parties. Leader is Nawaz khan Naji Kumail1293 (talk) 18:03, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kumail1293: I'm sorry, but the BNF is running only one candidate (who runs under the Independent Banner), and can't be considered big enough to be added here. If they win their seat, we might add them. -- Abbasi786786 (talk) 19:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abbasi786786 He is winner now. Official announcement shall be made later. Kumail1293 (talk) 20:57, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Abbasi786786 This year 3 contestent was contesting from BNF Kumail1293 (talk) 20:58, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kumail1293: I have added BNF(N). Thank you for the recommendation. -- Abbasi786786 (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Independents and Reserved seats

@SheriffIsInTown: @Saad Ali Khan Pakistan: @Kumail1293: (replied to people who have a high level of authorship and edits on this article and who have made edits recently to this article)

How should we display the independent candidates who joined political parties after winning seats and reserved seats on the headline infoboxes and result pages? We need a convention to use across different Pakistani election articles, as different articles are using different methods. The article on the 2018 general election currently includes only general and reserved seats and excludes independent candidates who joined political parties after the election, while the current articles on the 2020 Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly election and the 2013 general election includes all independent candidates who joined political parties after the election, reserved seats, and general seats.

I'm in favor of including only general seats inside the headline infobox values (those are the only seats that were directly elected) and in the results sections, and providing a more detailed look at the composition of the Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly and the formation of the 3rd assembly of Gilgit-Baltistan on the articles Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly and List of members of the 3rd Assembly of Gilgit-Baltistan, and its own section in this article where we can have info on the government formation similar to this section in the 2018 general election article titled "Government formation". This is because in fact many of the independents who are currently joining PTI in fact beat the official PTI candidate (so that more accurately reflects the will of the people and result of the election), and also I think that this article should focus more on the election than government formation (which we can put into a section of this article and into other articles as I said earlier).

The constituency-wise party list data and data to use on election maps can be based on the official party registration of candidates, so for example Nawaz Khan Naji who affiliates himself with the BNF(N) could be displayed as an Independent candidate, and Javed Ali Manwa who affiliates himself with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf would also be displayed as an Independent candidate on these lists. Then on the government formation section we can make note of which political parties they joined in the end.

What do you all think of this idea?

-- Abbasi786786 (talk) 18:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is quite reasonable and good idea and majority of winning independent candidates were contesting against PTI Kumail1293 (talk) 12:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abbreviation of Muhammad to M. on Constituency lists

@SheriffIsInTown: (tagging you because you are the only person who has shown opposition so far to this idea)

In cases where candidates have more than three names and one of those names is Muhammad, I believe that we should abbreviate that to M. This is an extremely, extremely common convention in Pakistan and is done by many reputable news outlets (in fact many are just dropping the Muhammad or M. entirely).

Example #1 of Muhammad being dropped entirely from candidates' names done by The Express Tribune (Raja Muhammad Zakaria Khan Maqpoon shortened to Raja Zakaria Khan Maqpoon) (Muhammad Khalid Khurshid Khan shortened to Khalid Khursheed Khan)

Example #2 of Muhammad being dropped entirely from candidates' names or abbreviated done by Pakistan Today (Raja Muhammad Zakaria Khan Maqpoon shortened to Raja Zakaria Khan Maqpoon) (Muhammad Khalid Khurshid Khan shortened to Khalid Khurshid Khan) (Syed Muhammad Ali Shah shortened to Syed M Ali Shah)

-- Abbasi786786 (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As they each is known to me and they have different names in Official documents and in public like Raja Zakaria Khan Maqoon is known as Raja Zakaria Maqoon .. and same Kumail1293 (talk) 12:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]