This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Could someone more adept at such matters please retitle this page to 'Future...' not 'Next...' as Next implies a regularity, which is untrue of by-elections. OGBC1992 (talk) 09:53, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't though, it's been used incorrectly in the West Lancs page too and I have made that point on that exact page. It has always been the case that 'Next' has been used for elections which will continue to reoccur in the future (General Elections, Northern Irish Assembly, Senedd, etc.) and 'Future' is used for one-off elections, like by-elections, when it's unclear at page creation as to what year polling day will take place (any by-election triggered after September, basically.)
Only two candidates (Carter-Kandola and Western) were in the Infobox (presumably as they were the only ones mentioned in the article body), but now we have the SOPN I've added all nine. As a result it looks a little crowded. I've skimmed the archives at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom but can't see any discussion about having a lot of candidates in the infobox prior to the election. I know we usually only list candidates/parties who get over 5% of the vote once the election is over, but I'm unsure whether they should all be there during the election... -- M2Ys4U(talk)19:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The usual convention is for those parties which saved their deposits in the corresponding election last time, in other words, those who got 5%. Over the years we've found this is the fairest. doktorbwordsdeeds20:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]