|WikiProject Film||(Rated Stub-class)|
List of Films
It's widely expected that the filmography in this section is incomplete, so feel free to add any listings that you come across, or delete any that are no longer running at the given venue.
McDoobAU93 03:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Is Spidey truly a 4D film?
I have a question for readers on the subject of the Spider-Man attractions at Universal's parks in Florida and Japan. In my opinion, this is a dark ride that happens to use 3D films as part of its special-effects package, and thus should not be listed as a 4D film. However, it does meet parts of the definition being presented. Perhaps it should be listed separately, as it's more of a hybrid attraction. Opinions?
McDoobAU93 17:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
I personaly think these 4-D movies are the scaryest things man has ever invented.
--Knowlege: Life's greatest gift, or terrible curse, how do you use it...? (talk) 17:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
No film is 4D?
- I was wondering about that too. However, the term 3-D has already been commonly used in a way that ignores time in counting the dimensions (a buzz term really), so the mistake is hardly unique to the term 4-D.
- That said, it seems to me the article should be rewritten to reflect that the hype surrounding 3-D and 4-D films is not really based in scientific fact. --Dekker451 (talk) 23:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- I'd read that the fourth dimension is no longer interpreted as time. But I'm no expert on the subject either.--22.214.171.124 (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
This wiki really needs revamped
This wiki looks pretty rough. Would anyone object to everything before list of films being completely re-done? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunafizzle (talk • contribs) 21:47, 15 December 2011
- Feel free to go right ahead. 21:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Removed: The Adventures Of Moo Monkey || 2012 || Cinamax Theater, Cottonwood AZ, United States ||
4D vs. 4DX?
Upon adding Iron Man 3 to the list, I noticed that it's also labeled as 4DX on its wikipedia article. Should 4DX films be included in the 4D article or should they remain separate? 4DX may appear to just be a branding name, as the description of 4DX and 4D are nearly identical, but I don't know enough about it to really say. However, I thought I would bring up this point for discussion. I personally feel 4DX should probably be included in the 4D article for previously mentioned reasons. What do you guys think? The same, or unique and separate? Thanks. --Tsukiakari (talk) 14:47, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Edited Pirates 4-D entry to reflect a major revision to its Article. Note that this film actually first opened in 1997, not 1999, at Sea World Ohio, then at Busch Gardens Williamsburg in 1998, then Thorpe Park in 1999 as well as (probably) Busch Gardens Tampa Bay later in 1999. Re-ordered Release Venue(s) to reflect 1997-1999 time period, in order. Placed new Notes entry. Moved unrelated entry from Pirates 4-D Notes to its own entry (The Amazing Adventures of Spider-man (1999). Please note: I take no responsibility for the veracity of this Spider-man entry. I simply moved it to preserve the information, and leave it to others to support it. Oddjob84 (talk) 14:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Moved table entry from article to talk pending verification. Edit by IP editor was incorrect in table, entry would not display. Will replace it into table correctly after verifying its notability. Pasted entry: ''Fly High:The Legend Of Black Man'' ''First Indian 4-D Film'' 2017 [Directed By Rahul Rathish Kumar] Oddjob84 (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
This film fails to meet notability. Neither its title or director have been found in a search effort. The claim of "first Indian 4-D film" apparently belongs to another film. See: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Indias-first-Bollywood-4D-film-is-low-budget/articleshow/29905841.cms This item will not be placed in the article. Oddjob84 (talk) 15:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Edits October 2017
Changed original "Screening Formats" table to a larger format with more fields. The information is the same, excepting some additions in the new fields, including references. The new table is sortable. The original format has been preserved (remarked out) for the present. I will return and clean up after a period for comments. I think the distinction between commercial cinemas and those in theme parks is artificial, and I will be adding the theme park systems shortly unless there are strident objections. Oddjob84 (talk) 15:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)