Important Note

IMPORTANT ... PLEASES NOTE ... cartridge case and bullet dimensions are incorrectly labeled in mm then inches in parens ... it should in fact be reversed ... the labels should be in inches ... then converted to mm ...

william wilson

Well, you could have just changed "is_SI_specs" parameter value to "no"

Anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.132.221 (talk) 00:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.cip-bp.org/index.php?id=tdcc-telechargement
- In .223 Remington on 2011-05-20 21:28:33, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 10mm Auto on 2011-05-23 02:08:47, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In .223 Remington on 2011-05-31 04:44:11, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In .325 WSM on 2011-05-31 12:36:32, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 10mm Auto on 2011-06-01 01:40:56, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 5.45x39mm on 2011-06-19 14:22:29, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 6.5x68mm on 2011-06-19 20:34:20, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
- In 8x57mm IS on 2011-06-19 21:41:24, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

The entire "effects" section appears to be nothing but OR. It's not cited, and comments like "Even using a 5" bbl. it is not likely that you would hit 1,450fps with a 125gr bullet in the .357 SIG. Not while staying within SAAMI pressure limits" are obvious OR. Cite or remove, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.119.78.52 (talk) 07:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research

The entire effects section is little more than a thinly veiled debate about whether 9x23 is 'better' than 357 Sig. One poster mentions that ballistics are identical between the two rounds, and fails to cite anything, while the other mentions that ballistics are not comparable, and fails to cite anything. Syr74 (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

9x21 description

"the 9×21mm loaded with the bullet further forward". The 9x21 has the same cartridge OAL as the 9x19 Luger, so the bullet is not "further forward", but is actually deeper in the slightly longer case.--Rickybill (talk) 17:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 9×23mm Winchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cip-bp.org/index.php?id=tdcc-telechargement
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928000000/http://www.handloads.com/misc/saami.htm to http://www.handloads.com/misc/saami.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150319133613/http://saami.org/specifications_and_information/specifications/Velocity_Pressure_CfPR.pdf to http://www.saami.org/specifications_and_information/specifications/Velocity_Pressure_CfPR.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]