Talk:AC58

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Terrible Citation and Reference

The one citation for this article is terrible. It is to some girl/guy's blog entry. I do not remember the exact policy but I am pretty sure it is close to "personal blog entries rarely meet the standards." I would like to remove some of the unsourced statements but I don't have time to double check the policy about citing billy bob's blog. The one further reference (formatted incorrectly too) is a dead link which is unfortunate but understandable.

One of the things I am skeptical about is the statistic for the amount of armor that this munition will penetrate. This statistic is not listed in the fr.wiki article that the text was based on and is taken directly from bill bob's blog post. It would be wonderful if a french speaking wikipedian could do some digging and see if there are any sources that could improve this article. DouglasCalvert (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AC58. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101011183913/http://www.ftbe.be/pdf/TTA150_Titre15.pdf to http://www.ftbe.be/pdf/TTA150_Titre15.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]