Talk:A Midsummer Night's Dream (opera)

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Some issues I see with this article

Numerous peacock terms
No references/citations
Appears to be totally WP:OR/WP:CRUFT

Thoughts? -- weirdoactor ^t^|^c 22:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It's pretty much me writing as a complete newbie. I really ought to fix it. Moreschi ^Deletion! 11:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well. Yes. Especially considering that you are a...what's the word? Ah, yes...deletionist. Sort of ruins your credibility. Hee. Want some help? -- weirdoactor ^t^|^c 21:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I plead the fifth amendment...err, that's WP:BITE. Don't cut too much, though, 'cause most of it's true and I've even got a source. Cheers, Moreschi ^Deletion! 21:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cut? Heck no. I was hoping to help you source (I'm a research junkie, thus my love of Wikipedia); but if you've got one, splendid. That and make it read less like a review in some places, and more encyclopedic. Do you want the help? I'm more than willing. This is a cool article that's more than worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, and I want to make it stronger. Right now, it could probably be WP:AfD'd most riki-tick on the issues I mentioned alone; and I'd like to help avoid that from happening. I can tell by your user name (which is awesome, by the way) that you have the same passion for the subject I do; so I'm more than willing to pitch in, if you want my help. -- weirdoactor ^t^|^c 04:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please...be my guest...go ahead! And good luck! Cheers, Moreschi ^Deletion! 11:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't had a chance to do any work on this article yet; but you're really taking the bull by the horns! I'll try to help, but this week sucks schedule-wise for me. Just wanted to commend you on the work! -- weirdoactor ^t^|^c 23:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Alright, I think that's a bit better. Still too many peacock terms but at least we now have references and 13 inline cits. Coming back, older and wiser, to correct your own newbie mistakes is quite a humbling experience, and certainly an interesting one. Hammers home the importance of WP:BITE, I supppose. Moreschi ^Deletion! 18:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't discount your own bravery; I've been on here awhile, and have yet to create an article. BAWK! I'm scared of being speedied, and then crying all over my DRV forms. -- weirdoactor ^t^|^c 18:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I didn't create this one, but I have numerous others. It kind of helps that it seems as though all operas are notable and the vast majority of opera singers are also notable, and that I write mostly about opera. Thanks again. Do you want to cut some of the more peacocky terms? It's often hard to see your own mistakes, but I will add some more cites a bit later on. Cheers, Moreschi ^Deletion! 18:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benjamin Britten 1945.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Benjamin Britten 1945.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]