Talk:A Mighty Heart

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Mighty Heart article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content

Hey LLBBooks, I can understand you modifying or altering the content but why have you blanked out so much that I filled? They are certainly not speculation..I wrote all this 'coz there was a news item concerning this on CNN-IBN in India. I think what I have written is factual and conforms to good quality. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sriram sh (talk • contribs) 16:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, Sriram sh. I'm glad we have the chance to discuss this... I was sorta hoping you would contact me. The reason I made the changes that I did was that I found some of the language to be not encyclopedic, "or so the makers say" being an example. Also, I didn't think the information about where Pitt and Jolie were residing was relevant. I cut this section: "Apparently, the film-makers zeroed in on this city because of it's perceived similarity, in terms of topography to the city of Karachi in Pakistan, where Daniel Pearl was beheaded by Islamic fundamentalists, allegedly affiliated to the al-Qaeda, the mastermind organization, in response to the American invasion of Iraq." because according to the BBC article I cited, that wasn't the reason why they moved production.

However, I realize that I might have been a smidge heavy-handed in my editing, and for that I apologize. You did include a good bit of information to start the article with, and that's never a bad thing! If you feel that there should be things added to the article, please feel free to add, just add a link to your source, because that's the main reason I changed the article: I saw no documentation. If you can find that article that you read, please feel free to add the information back with the source... that would be great. Thanks, LLBBooks 06:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LLBBooks, am glad you clarified some issues there, actually am a novice in editing stuff so you could find some things definitely jarring here and there. Guess, would just get better with time, but the stuff about why Pune was chosen, I can vouch for it's authenticity. Of that I got no doubts at all. Thanks for da clarifications dude Sriram sh 08:11, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]