Jump to content

Talk:Acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What

[edit]

What is the point in having separate pages for each AML subtype? The FAB classification is being replaced anyway, so the terminology is a poor selector. Apart from APML, I think this content should be merged with the AML page. JFW | T@lk 06:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually thinking the same. M3 is the only subtype treated differently, so the others should be coverable at acute myeloid leukemia. Besides, as you point out, if we're gonna do this we should use the WHO scheme instead of FAB. MastCell Talk 21:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]