Talk:Adaalat (TV series)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal!

Don't merge - I don't think article K.D.Pathak should be merged in Adaalat! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 19:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dont merge - Obviously, K D Pathak has its own idenetity, thought being fictional character. There are other fictional characters such as JETHALA, DAYA from TAARAK MEHTA KA OOLTA CHASMA as individual articles. So, it should not be as if there is a seperate page for K D, then it will be better for readers. Am I right or Am I right ? Yash t 101 :) 02:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The main article can alone manage the contents in List of Adaalat episodes. The list article lacks notability. I suppose, it was moved earlier to that page. Discuss here. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 13:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Not notable enough independently. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: Same reason as above. --BPositive (talk) 15:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - per Srikanth Sir. Yash t 101 15:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Would apprecite it if you would refer to me as Rsrikanth05. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC) [reply]
No merge, since our convention with articles is that each show gets an article, then a list of episodes (without plot summaries), and each season gets a list WITH plot summaries. See, for example, see House (TV series), List of House episodes, and House (season 3). Since the coverage of this show is still being built out, there is no reason to regress in coverage. Jclemens (talk) 23:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~The character doesn't have enough notability on it's own.~~ --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This seems enough. Will start adding refs then, --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]