This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The article has an attribution to the article in the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica, and it shows!
The language and the style are very dated; most readers under 30, I suspect, would have difficulty understanding the phrasing. Also, the article has many statements of opinion that are otherwise unattributed. Alas, I have no better sources.
So I feel that the entire article needs a rewrite, both to modernise the language and, to a lesser extent, to minimise the amount of "fluff". Any takers?