Talk:Ageostrophy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ageostrophy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Ageostrophy is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Limnology and Oceanography Low‑importance

	Oceans portal This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sentrifugal force

It is bad practice to refer to centrifugal force as if it were a real phenomenon, cf. centripetal force. Furthermore, I question whether the reference is valid anyway, as the "centrifugal" effect is exactly what balances the radial force to create geostrophic movement in the first place (the idealized case). Friction is the essential example of ageostrohpy as far as I can understand, but also external forces (forces other than the one towards the center) affecting the course of the fluid, and non-circular force fields (isobars) implying the existence of such forces. Geir Halbo, 17th May 2015 15:00 EST 90.149.34.81 (talk) 13:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm classification

The highest WikiProject classification for Ageostrophy is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 20:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ageostrophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060909055639/http://www.ems.psu.edu/~young/meteo422/Lecture%2017.htm to http://www.ems.psu.edu/~young/meteo422/Lecture%2017.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]