Talk:Agfacolor

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
	This article needs an appropriate infobox template.

Cleanup ideas

The Agfacolor article could benefit from a deeper treatment. I have some hardcopy references, but I don't have much experience with it or much special knowledge, so it would be nice for people with more to contribute ideas about cleaning up the article:

Can someone who reads German and English bring over the information from the German Wiki article?

The trivia section needs to be integrated in the larger article.

Agfacolor had a unique "look", intentionally (the article already alludes to this 'touch' to a certain extent). That there was a race for the "best" color film glosses that there were substantially different opinions as to what film was best -- and for what situations it was best.

The article emphasizes movie stock, but more people will know it, and see it today, as still film.

The heavy comparison to Kodachrome is a little POV, especially since most readers now will never have used Kodachrome, either. Or especially, know much about it. There were lots of color films, and it may not be appropriate to say Agfacolor was specifically a response to Kodachrome.

The stories about "Women are Better Diplomats" are very interesting, but mostly belong in a separate article.

More attention needs to be given to the film's later incarnations, and to their final demise. It was a good film, why was it ultimately put out of production?

Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 00:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reborn section

The aerial film marketed by Rollei today has as little to do with the pre-1978 West-German Agfa process as did East-German ORWO during the 1970s. The modern aerial film is actually Agfa RS(X) aka Aviphot, processed as either C-41 or E6, introduced circa during the early 1980s and made in 35mm still up until the demolition of the German Agfa factories in 2007 and 2008. From the late-1980s up until the early 90s, Agfa also used RSX for their Moviechrome line in Super8, available as 40 ASA. After 2008, RSX aka Aviphot was produced as medium format slide sheets by Agfa-Gaevert in Belgium (from which smaller formats were cut by Rollei in 35mm, and by Wittner Cinetec in 16mm and Super8). The only connection to Agfacolor (or Agfachrome) of old is that the Rollei still photography version looks like it was geared to resemble the original colors and gradation of early 1940s Agfachrome slide film when the Rollei version is shot today in bright daylight and processed as reversal in E6. But chemically, the process has nothing at all to do with Agfacolor or Agfachrome of old. --79.242.222.168 (talk) 22:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Most importantly the entire section was completely unsourced and not written in competent English as it used non-English words instead of the correct ones. Removed without reservation. oknazevad (talk) 20:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agfacolor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130213174349/http://www.historicphotoarchive.com/f2/ansco.html to http://historicphotoarchive.com/f2/ansco.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]