Jump to content

Talk:Air-mass thunderstorm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAir-mass thunderstorm has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 1, 2011Good article nomineeListed

NPOV

[edit]

Since the only place mentioned in the article with this activity is the US Gulf coast, it is violating neutral point of view. These thunderstorms obviously occur elsewhere. Thegreatdr (talk) 14:17, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the issue, and did some work to get it up to start and C class. Thegreatdr (talk) 17:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

Is there a more specific category than simply 'Storm'? Juliancolton (talk) 20:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other relevant cats have been added. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great. I'll try to review the article's GAN this evening (I doubt I'll find many issues). Juliancolton (talk) 21:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. Look forward to it. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just as a side-comment, if possible, I think it would be interesting to see an example or two of a particular severe garden variety cell. Is that feasible? Juliancolton (talk) 21:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know about severe, but I've provided another couple Cb images. Garden variety Tstorms normally don't experience much (if any) vertical wind shear, so they look physically different than organized severe thunderstorms. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Air-mass thunderstorm/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Juliancolton (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC) As I suspected, I couldn't find many issues at all with the article. It seems like an informative, comprehensive account of a surprisingly specific subset of thunderstorms. It has nice accompanying illustrations and overall more than qualifies for GA status. I have just one suggestion: "Single cell thunderstorms normally last 20–30 minutes." I assume this is the period of time between the cell's formation and dissipation, but I'm concerned less informed readers might take it to mean thunderstorm conditions at a given location will last 20 to 30 minutes. Nice work regardless! Juliancolton (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Air-mass thunderstorm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Air-mass thunderstorm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]