Talk:Air conditioned clothing

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled

The article appears to be mixing units of power and energy to an extent that it is not possible to tell whether Air conditioned clothing actually saves energy (using 4000 watts is using 4000 watts (as it runs), using 4000 watt-hours over am 8 hour period is an average of 500 watts). My guess is that the power used is a lot less than 4000 watts, that's a lot of heat to get rid of! -98.175.217.74 (talk) 17:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The 4,400 watt portable power was most probably a standard 4400 mAh battery (probably 12V, or 52.8Wh). "Watts per hour" really meant "watts an hour per hour" which are just watts. Made the corrections to reinstate basic sanity. Infofarmer (talk) 12:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article was clearly written by someone working for the company using the page as an advertisement Pyroboy1080 (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The third paragraph "One advantage of..." attempts to compare air conditioners but the person who wrote it clearly has no experience in actually testing and comparing various electrical solutions. AnotherNeko (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]