Talk:Al-Aqsa Foundation

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This page is outdated.George bush has been found to be treasonous in the opinion of his nation.He hides from the justice system with the political tools given to him to use FOR his people. Eventually he will meet his negative fate.This page needs updating unless off-course, it IS controlled by his own supporters. Then it would make sense why its still here.

Allegations of terrorism

It appears someone went through this article and posted several allegations about this organization being tied or accused of aiding terror organizations yet no support whatsoever. I removed the references since there was no evidence. Boobymonster (talk) 19:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Al-Aqsa Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the exact subject of the article? Merge needed?

The article says that al-Aqsa Foundation is designated as terrorist by the United Nations. However, the only related reference I can find in the UNSC Consolidated List ([1]) is QDe.109 Name: AL-HARAMAIN & AL MASJED AL-AQSA CHARITY FOUNDATION ([2]). As far as I can tell, this corresponds to al-Haramain Foundation. What is the relation between both entities and corresponding articles? --MarioGom (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, "Al-Haramain & Al Masjed al-Aqsa Charity Foundation" was al-Haramain Foundation's branch in Bosnia and Herzegovina and bears no relation with al-Aqsa e.V in Germany. The whole UN claim seems bogus. I'm cleaning it up from the article. Feel free to add it back if proper sources support it. --MarioGom (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible sourcing

There's some really bad sourcing here – much of it from unreliable sources, including advocacy platforms, or just directly from government websites. Not a great combo for either verification or NPOV. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]