This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
I think in the part called "later life" there are a series of controversial issues which should not be contained in an encyclopaedic biography. One reference (14) to a such a controversy is not enough to make a claim. Especially in light of the previous activities of Alastair Crooke, aimed at bringing conflicting parties to a table and end conflicts with negotiations, the part "later life" is at least unexpected. It sounds either as if Crooke had sided with the wrong party, or as a hidden criticism of his bi-partisan approach to conflicts. I suggest that this part be rewritten in a more neutral way. Are there people opposed to such an improvement? Mregelsberger (talk) 07:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Its a smear paragraph which is out of scope of "later life" section. I have removed it. 185.77.177.2 (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}