Talk:All Systems Down

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 May 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notable Author

Is this a notable new author with a notable book? Are the reviews notable enough to warrant maintaining this page?

I'd argue "yes" to both.

A top technothriller on Goodreads
Quality reviews, including The Good Men Project, which gets 1.5 million unique visitors per month

However, this page needs more reviews. It looks like there are plenty. I can add them. I'd be happy if someone else did this. Bmax52 (talk) 01:15, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your assertion about Goodreads is totally misleading. The poll shows that a total of 15 people voted for the book. Deb (talk) 09:09, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I already looked for reviews from additional sources but can only find things like Amazon and Goodreads, where the reviews are submitted by ordinary readers. It's not a question of how many people might have viewed the website, it's a question of who is writing the reviews. I'm sure you would be happy if someone else did this, but we can only do it if they exist. Deb (talk) 09:16, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

The plot section, which is of a disproportionate length, is in almost identical words to the Kirkus review. Please re-word. Deb (talk) 06:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Bmax52 (talk) 19:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]