Talk:Alzheimer's disease and diet
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Peer reviews from fellow classmates |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
My name is Doyeon Koo and used my user name as Felis Koo. in this talk page. I improperly moved the sandbox out so my page was an orphan, did not properly show, and had other technical issues. I deleted my original page and moved the sandbox again to this article. However, I edited some stuff on my old page that I improperly created and now I lost that page. If you go to the history of time when the draft was due, it does not exactly look like what I had at the time I finished my editing. Dr. Potter said I should leave a note to this talk page so feel free to ask me any questions. My e-mail is dkoo6@gatech.edu. Doyeon Koo (talk) 02:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC) Peer Reviews[edit]1. Quality of Information: 2 – Has updated factual information but perhaps should include information about beta and tau proteins involved with the disease in addition to the diet. 2. Article size: 1 - Does not meet size requirement set by Dr. Potter 3. Readability: 2 – Readable 4. Refs: 2 – Cited properly, included PBMED links 5. Links: 2 – Sufficient Link to outside articles 6. Responsive to comments: 2- No comments 7. Formatting: 2 – neat concise page 8. Writing: 1 – Some grammatical errors 9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2 – Used real name 10. Outstanding?: 2 – Sufficiently describes the effects of diet on the disease Total: 18 out of 20 JahedaK talk (1:26 PM, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your comments. After your peer-review I have edited grammatical errors and expanded article size to meet the requirement. Feliskoo (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC) _______________ 1. Quality of Information: 2 2. Article size:1 - Slightly below minimum 3. Readability:2 - Easy to follow 4. Refs:2 5. Links:2 - Just be sure to link the first mention of a term if you're going to link it 6. Responsive to comments:2 7. Formatting:1 - well organized, but the last section is too short or should be removed 8. Writing:1 - some incorrect grammar 9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:2 10. Outstanding?:2 - good job
JacobKhouri (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your review. Based on the comments you made, I wrote more in the last section by including the western diet and compared how these two diet patterns affect Alzheimer's disease patients. I updated the article size to meet the requirement and edited some grammatical issues. Feliskoo (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC) _______________ 1. Quality of Information: 2 2. Article size: 2 3. Readability: 2 - nice guideline 4. Refs: 2 - more than 10 refs 5. Links: 2 6. Responsive to comments: 2 7. Formatting: 2 - very well organized 8. Writing: 1 - sentence flow problem 9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2 10. Outstanding?: 2 - very outstanding
JinOuKim (talk) 21:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your review. Based on the comments, I edited the sentence structure of my article to make it flow more fluently. Feliskoo (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC) |
- Have summarized and merged into the main article were much of the content was already covered. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)