Talk:Amanita aestivalis
 | Amanita aestivalis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 9, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that it is uncertain whether the brown and white American star-footed Amanitas are different species? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Amanita aestivalis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ucucha 13:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- "both dusky brownish grey color radial stripes": what?
- Ugh... sloppy. Fixed. Sasata (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Closing quotation mark missing after "limbs.
- Done. Sasata (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Gloss mycorrhizal
- New England is not a state
- Fixed. Sasata (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- The Great Smoky Mountains are north of Florida, so the distribution cannot extend south to the GSM.
- Repaired. I've reorganized the citations to make it more explicit who said what about the distribution. Sasata (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Ucucha 13:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- The caption of the second picture says the cap is almost flat, but the picture seems to show an umbo. Ucucha 13:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Altered caption. Thanks for another quick review! Sasata (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick replies. I am passing the article now. All four Web of Knowledge hits looked like false positives. Ucucha 16:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)