Talk:Amelia Gates Building
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Notability tag
[edit]@Melcous: The Amelia Gates Building meets WP:NBUILDING guidelines because of the following significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources:
- Kent Seavey's Carmel A History in Architecture page 75
- Alissandra Dramov's Historic Buildings of Downtown Carmel-by-the-Sea page 74
- Alissandra Dramov's Past & Present Carmel-by-the-Sea page 79
Please remember "sources vary in quality and depth of coverage." per WP:GNG. There is no requirement for the volume of information. The above multiple sources demonstrate historic and architectural importance. This is also one of my top five to keep. Greg Henderson (talk) 17:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Whether this article is one of your personal "top five to keep" has no bearing on notability; you have no entitlement to keep any articles and Wikipedia notability guidelines apply fairly to all articles. Also, please see WP:ARCADIA, where this publisher has been discussed by the broader community. As alluded to by your comment above, articles you have created are filled with it, yet it is essentially an indiscriminate source which carries almost no weight, and counts little towards notability, if at all. Please find better sources. Left guide (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)