Talk:Anaconda Smelter Stack

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anaconda Smelter Stack article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Montana Mid‑importance

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tallest brick stack?

Recover from Archive 1:
The chimney flue in Port Pirie, South Australia (for the lead smelter there) is 205m tall (so it's taller than the Anaconda smelter stack) and I remember man who used to work there (during it's construction in the 1970s) saying that it was built entirely out of bricks. But I'll have to find some hard evidence for that. The base of the stack is housed inside a shed, so I don't know if that makes it free standing or not.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pez17 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The 205 m tall stack of the Port Pirie lead smelter is made of reinforced concrete with a lining of bricks according to archival photos at Maywald Memories. Find "stack". A line drawing entitled "Tall Stack Project" states 350,000 bricks were used for its internal lining, as well as a "concrete shell" with reinforcements, that is, rebar as shown in accompanying photos. — Joe Kress (talk) 21:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Smelter stack vs smoke stack

Seems calling this, and things like it, a smoke stack is much more common. It's technically a smelter stack, but people seem to call these things smoke stacks. The park is call Anaconda smoke stack state park. WP:commonname. 208.117.96.2 (talk) 18:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is specifically the smoke stack OF the Anaconda Smelter though, and the most commonly used term for it in wp:reliable sources is Anaconda Smelter Stack, rather than the wp:synth name "Anaconda smoke stack"--Kev min § 19:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First, you obviously don't know what wp:SYNTH means if you think it can apply to a two word term. Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source. Are you suggesting that I got the word smoke from one source and stack from another, then concluded it should be called a smoke stack?

Secondly, maybe actually check the sources before you make a claim about their contents. Most of them use the term smoke stack, some use the term smelter stack and also smoke stack, while a small minority use only smelter stack.

Wp:commonname is pretty clearly smoke stack. 208.117.96.2 (talk) 21:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]