Talk:And Then We Danced
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pro-russian groups
[edit]@Aranya: there is a definite source highlighting connection of pro-russian groups to the protests - if there is a relevant source claiming a connection there is no , could you please WP:NPOV isn't applicable.--Aleqsandrebadridze (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Aleqsandrebadridze: Thank you for reverting to a previous version. There was another edit (specifically this one) that came into question when reverting to the previous version. – Aranya (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Is interpressnews a neutral/good source? It's used for nearly all the sources in that section. Ideally some other (neutral) news outlets should be used, where possible. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Well, it is the best possible source in English language. It is a news agency like Reuters, and usually is quite accurate. Also, the facts sourced by interpressnews are merely just facts and I don't think they might have any interest to corrupt facts. There is also BBC news report, but interpressnews was more uptime.--Aleqsandrebadridze (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Is interpressnews a neutral/good source? It's used for nearly all the sources in that section. Ideally some other (neutral) news outlets should be used, where possible. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirming. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 20:18, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Liberal media and politicians try to put label of pro-russian on the protesting groups. The fact there are sources saying these groups are pro-russian doesn't mean they are pro-russian indeed, considering that leaders of these groups say they are against Russian policies. You can mention in the article that some people refer to the protesters as pro-russian, but right now article breaks WP:NPOV rule and needs edit. —ArsenalAtletico2017 (talk) 16:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- You might have been right, but your reading of WP:NPOV is totally wrong: look at the rule more accurately, there is an entire part WP:WEIGHT. Hundred of internationally recognized sources (Reuters for examples), NGO reports, Georgian outlets highlight connections with Russian authorities and their pro-russian views. In case of Lortkipanidze, he is the head of a Yevgeny Primakov Foundation based in Russia, funded by Russia and named after a KGB spy. In this case your argument about neutrality simply doesn't apply, just as the argument of "flat earth" doesn't apply to Earth article. --Aleqsandrebadridze (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Award nomination
[edit]Categories:
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class Nordic cinema articles
- Nordic cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class Georgia (country) articles
- Unknown-importance Georgia (country) articles
- WikiProject Georgia (country) articles
- Start-Class Sweden articles
- Low-importance Sweden articles
- All WikiProject Sweden pages
- Start-Class LGBT articles
- WikiProject LGBT studies articles