Talk:Anglo Colombian School
This article was nominated for deletion on July 30, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph of School, Avenida 19 # 152A - 48 Bogotá - Colombia be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Colombia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Article not neutral
[edit]The POV template has been added to the article due to its lack of neutrality, citations and relevance. What is the point of having such an article? to auto-proclaim itself? Please edit the article making sure it has a neutral stance and explain its relevance. Thank you
This article is self-propaganda, wikipedia is to laern not to post "the great achivements of some crappy school".
Resolution of POV dispute?: Who says? What is the evidence. There is no dispute... why not just change it?
Can you please supply some citations for alternative view and it would be nice to sign your contributions. There are quote marks above ... where are they quoted from? Victuallers 15:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Why is there a dispute for this article? It might be a sloppy article that needs sources, but a NPOV dispute? Someone needs to take that tag down. Canutethegreat 23:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Done! This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Assess
[edit]Important school. Needs pictures, infobox and references to be a great article. Schools project can help or try 10:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
P.S. A versian in Spanish? You can use the same pictures ...
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anglo Colombian School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110905132502/http://anglocolombiano.edu.co/Asoexanglo/index.php to http://anglocolombiano.edu.co/Asoexanglo/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)