Jump to content

Talk:Anutpada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Advaita Vedanta, Not Buddhist?

[edit]

Most of sources in this article stem from Advaita Vedanta scholars, not Buddhist ones. This is more a Hindu term than it is a Buddhist one, even if the term has Buddhist roots. (20040302 (talk) 18:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Usage in Buddhism WP:SYN

[edit]

In Nagarjuna's analysis, at the absolute level of truth no dharmas arise, hence sunyata is anutpada.(Odin 1982, p.20) This, is not what Odin says. Moreover, Odin is not really an RS for Nagarjuna's Mulamadhamika, outside of the Sanlun tradition. What is going on here? (20040302 (talk) 19:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Not so much, I'm afraid, unless someone devotes some time to this article... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It may be best just to delete it... ? (20040302 (talk))

Maybe? I don't know. Oh, whatever; if relevant, the info is always there in the history. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:48, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]