Talk:Architecture of Hong Kong/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Bamboo scafolding
What about the use of bamboo as scafolding in Hong Kong? Shouldn't that be mentioned, too? --203.218.71.210 11:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Residential buildings
I think the significance of the large number of tall residential buildings has not been stressed enough. For instance I discovered today that out of the 100 tallest residential buildings in the world, 38 are in Hong Kong. Dunbai trails behind at second place with only 14. Sorrento 1 holds the title of being the third tallest residential building in the world. Please check here: http://www.emporis.com/en/bu/sk/st/tp/ty/rs/ User:Pelikan4001 23:03, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
The phrase "Extremely diverse"
I found the opening sentence "The Architecture of Hong Kong is extremely varied and diverse" questionable so I tagged it with a citition request tag, because HK's Architecture is heavily inclined to commercial Contemporary architecture IMHO. My citition request tag was removed by Benjwong who said "Is just an opening statement".
Well, since it is the opening sentence, so it cannot be inaccurate, leave alone exaggeration. "Extreme" is a word bears the meaning ultra, most, to the max. In order to qualify to use the word "extremely diverse", apart from Modern architecture and Chinese architecture the place should have some of the following:
- Medieval architecture
- Deconstructivism
- Castle
- Romanesque architecture
- Gothic architecture
- Baroque architecture
- Art Deco
- Greek architecture
- Expressionist architecture
Hong Kong's buildings of about styles are rare/absent, unless referenced materials are provided, it is not really convincing to use such a big phrase as "extremely diverse". Furthermore, for months that the tag had been on, no one can even find source to support the phrase "extremely diverse". Benjwong (who may need to work on his objectivity and accuracy from now on) should have removed the exaggerated phrase instead the citition tag. Cheers. --Da Vynci (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- Please look at the Wan Chai#Buildings and constructions section for some examples of architecture styles. Each area should have its own style. I mean, if you want to really compare. It doesn't have the most. I would think Las Vegas Strip has more. But I don't see why the original statement is an exaggeration. Benjwong (talk) 04:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Wan Chai#Buildings and constructions indicates that area has very few styles and that HK's architecture is not extremely diverse. I really don't want to adopt your logic that "It is extremely diverse...oh, but you know, what I mean by extremely diverse isn't really mean extremely diverse". (as in the PRO Talk page) I would like to adhere to the words normal meaning in wikipedia. If you are in doubt, cousult your dictionary and check out the list of styles I put above to get an idea what "extremely diverse" should means. --Da Vynci (talk) 09:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Architecture of Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080204231310/http://homepages.ipact.nl/~egram/skylines.html to http://homepages.ipact.nl/~egram/skylines.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 8 July 2017 (UTC)