Talk:Arnold & Porter

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Thurman Arnold Building - Washington, DC.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Thurman Arnold Building - Washington, DC.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arnold & Porter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.arnoldporter.com/offices.cfm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060614163446/http://www.msnbc.msn.com:80/id/6884657/site/newsweek to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6884657/site/newsweek
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://arnoldporter.webfactional.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a Wikipedia Entry or a Hagiography?

APCO exercises a very disturbing and an anti-democratic role in US foreign policy, especially concerning foreign states. As it is written, this is a firm-hagiography completely ignoring the perspective of those who find this firm troubling to say the least. The entry for APCO worldwide is actually a lot better. Here is an example: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/how-an-american-lobbying-company-apco-worldwide-markets-narendra-modi-to-the-world/articleshow/17537402.cms?from=mdr

196.12.203.30, although, I don't see how you made a leap to hagiography with this article; that's an interesting opinion. However, editorial opinions are not encyclopedic content. Please do research the facts and add those that belong on the page, citing sources, (which you seem to be charging others to do). You can delete any WP:PEACOCKery or outright adulation, of course... I just couldn't spot any. More importantly, where might I get a Hagiography tag constructed pronto? I've seen a tome's worth of pages that deserve one. Lindenfall (talk) 18:10, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Notable Alumni

The "Notable Alumni" section is sort of 90% alphabetical by last name. It should either be fully alphabetized, or some other ordering should be explicitly stated. Bhami (talk) 00:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]