Talk:Artemisia (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

Controversy

I cleaned the whole article up a bit, putting the numerous quotations into blockquote tags. The controversy section was far too long, I replaced a longish quote from the Steinem/Garrard fact sheet with a link to the complete text, and removed quote from biography page [1] that had nothing to do with the movie completely.—Austriacus (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Artemisia (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201202615/http://www.salon1999.com/ent/movies/feature/1998/05/15feature.html to http://www.salon1999.com/ent/movies/feature/1998/05/15feature.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Griselda Pollock's error about the daughters must be corrected

We have evidence that two of Artemisia's daughters survived to adulthood, Prudenzia and one other. We know this because Prudenzia got married in 1637 and in a letter Artemisia complains about how she has had to get a daughter settled in a marriage twice, in 1637 and 1649. If Prudenzia had been widowed and remarried in 1649 her mother would not have been responsible for paying her dowry, so it must be a different daughter. Mary Garrard believes this. The 1624 census lists only Prudenzia, so the daughter must've been born after 1624, and been old enough to marry in 1649. Artemisia writes that the daughter who married in 1649 could paint, and we know that Prudenzia could play the spinet and paint. Her daughters may have helped on her paintings. Pollock's statement about her teaching several daughters to paint is incorrect, when we only have evidence of two surviving daughters being taught to paint. The second daughter married a high-ranking knight who could only have married into a family claiming 4 quarters of nobility. So it is likely that the second daughter's father was not Artemisia's husband, but a high-ranking man, perhaps a patron of Artemisia. Her 94.197.30.140 (talk) 08:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not relevant to the film, because the film is not a documentary. It is only relevant to the article on Gentileschi herself. Sbishop (talk) 09:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]