Talk:Aruvikkuzhy Falls

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 August 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Kerala / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, it is not promoting any particular entity. --Soman (talk) 05:33, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find any information other than that which is sourced to the wikipedia page, which is based on the skyscrapercity forumposting, by someone whose username is clearly intended to promote tourism. That sounds like "unambiguously promotional" to me. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 05:43, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How can it be both a promotional article and a hoax article at the same time? You've asserted both? Did you seek assistance from WP:India before nominating for deletion. It may be that sourcing exists in a language other than English. Did you consider variant spellings? Cheers, Dloh cierekim 12:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]