Talk:Atakur inscription
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]It is unclear how important this inscription is until you read an important hidden in under "content": namely, that "memorial stones for warriors are common in medieval India, but one erected in memory of an animal is considered unique." Perhaps this line about why this is an interesting/unique inscription in particular should be moved to the summary paragraph? Tersxa (talk) 06:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Archaeology articles
- Unknown-importance Archaeology articles
- B-Class India articles
- Unknown-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Unknown-importance
- B-Class Karnataka articles
- Unknown-importance Karnataka articles
- B-Class Karnataka articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Karnataka articles
- WikiProject India articles