Talk:Atgeir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Norse history and culture (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated Stub-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Netvike[edit]

Link added to my webpage which includes more detail on atgeir-type weapons. More than need be included on the wikipage. Netvike (talk) 22:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

I am removing this external link. Chunjee (talk) 16:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

"Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam."

Contradiction[edit]

The first paragraph contradicts itself several times. In the first sentence it states unequivocally that the term predates the "Viking Age" and does not appear at all during the Viking Age. Then in the third sentence it states just as unequivocally that it refers to an item that existed only after the Viking Age. If this is meant to suggest a documented historical example of precognition, I'd like to see a source citation.

Then the second paragraph contradicts all of the above by stating that the term refers to a polearm of the Viking Age! What??

The perpetrator of this confusion appears to be Netvike, who slapped a new opening para on the article without checking to see if it fits the rest of the article. I hesitate to simply remove the offending first paragraph because there seems to be the germ of scholarship here. But his thesis is unclear and rambling. It requires significant improvements in clarity, and should be edited into the article, not just dumped at the top of it. 12.233.147.42 (talk) 03:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

vahls.com no longer valid resource[edit]

the website is now a gold investment website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.137.135 (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)