Talk:Atishaya Kshetra Lunwa Jain Temple
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Atishaya Kshetra Lunwa Jain Temple article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
untited
[edit]This page is created to let the society know about the famous Jain Pilgrimage and its magic. Devotees has great determination for Lunwa temples. Also it it created to let new generation about the religion and importance. This page does not contain any content which can harm sentiments of anyone , in case of any issue please contact at mailnaveenjain@gmail.com.
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... this page has been created to let the new generation aware about the temples in Lunwa , there history . Jainism has been part of ancient India from 6th century and its existence is all over india which can bee proved through archaeology findings , old temples etc. Lunwa is one among such Jain Pilgrimage and it is not created to promote any individuals , it is created to society know about the history of the sacred place. In case you think it should be deleted please justify the points. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navbindaas (talk • contribs) 14:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Navbindaas and welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia articles are based on the principle of WP:Notability. That is, an article on a subject should be created if the subject is notable. In the absence of more specific criteria, the subject is considered notable if there is significant coverage of the subject by third-party sources (i.e., sources unrelated to the subject). The article fails to provide such sources and a quick search on Google fails to find any coverage of "Atishaya Kshetra Lunwa" by third-party sources. Naturally, if you can provide a proof of coverage by unrelated sources (e.g., books that cover the temple to any significant level of detail), the article could stay.
- That said, even if the article could stay, it would have to be fixed in a major way. It is written in a non-neutral manner. Also, items like "Contact persons" do not belong on an encyclopedia and statements like "Please do not edit, kindly contact Naveen Ajmera for any changes" are even more unacceptable. Wikipedia is for everyone to edit. I hope that you can familiarize yourself a bit with Wikipedia policies, like WP:NPOV and WP:OWN, and contribute to the encyclopedia in the future. No longer a penguin (talk) 14:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)