Talk:Ator 2 – L'invincibile Orion

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film: Italian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

Geometric Nucleus

I don't recall ever seeing anything that said one way or the other that the nucleus was a WW II era atomic bomb. So I changed it to that the nucleus was destroyed by the bomb. Is there anything out there that says one way or the other?
JesseG July 6, 2005 02:43 (UTC)

Well its possible that it was implied, Mila saying that it "might be used as a weapon." -WarthogDemon 21:19, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like we're trying to read too much into the phrase "Geometric Nucleus". Even if it were logical to infer that the screenwriter was implying that it was a modern nuclear weapon (which isn't necessarily the case), such an inference is original research without a reliable source. JesseG's change was entirely appropriate. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just working up a theory, I know its original research and thus did not make the change back. Besides, who KNOWS what the heck the screenwriters were thinking? =) -WarthogDemon 22:51, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AtorBlademaster.jpg

Image:AtorBlademaster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced content

So my edits adding sources and content was reverted. What is the reasoning? Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of MST3K?

Not even as "Cavė Dwellers"? NO! Espngeek (talk) 23:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"geek" indeed --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 03:02, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Should this title be moved to The Blade Master to be consistent with the other Ator films? Rhindle The Red (talk) 16:50, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]