Talk:Automatic fire suppression

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firefighting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Link spam

Regarding the removal of links to 3 external website product pages, it's a shame that substantiating a claim with external websites is now regarded as linkspam. I find it hard to see how to provide readers with further information about emerging products in Europe without doing this and the article now rather mysteriously alludes to residential products without the reader being able to find out about them.

This article already has a rather skewed perspective, for example not mentioning water mist for commercial kitchens or maritime use. Perhaps a partial rewrite or some more subsections on available products are needed. I'm not sure residential pre-engineered automatic fire suppression deserves its own page yet.

Amh15 (talk) 11:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Amh15. Although links to manufacturers external websites can be useful in providing examples of components or systems being discussed in an article, a reference citation to a source meeting WP:V guidelines almost always provides sufficient information to sufficiently understand the issue. Linking to manufacturers' websites has been used as a backdoor method of advertising, and does not conform to WP:3PARTY. Cheers. Kilmer-san (talk) 17:08, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with you the article needs work, overall. It tends to repeat information covered in other articles and should probably be merged. Kilmer-san (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Automatic fire suppression. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160217070535/http://femalifesafety.org/fire-facts.html to http://femalifesafety.org/fire-facts.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]