# Talk:Automorphic number

WikiProject Mathematics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mathematics rating:
 Start Class
 Mid Importance
Field:  Number theory

## Other Bases?

other bases? Revolver 09:28, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

## Merging Circular number to here

As it has been concluded on the talk page for Circular number that this is a synonym of "Automorphic number", I think that they should be merged, after which Circular number should be made a redirect page to Automorphic number. Or the other way around, but since the name in OEIS is "automorphic number", this seems the best to me. --LambiamTalk 02:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

## Number is wrong

The 1000 digit number is wrong for k > 975. Just check it in any program which makes exact calculations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.170.121.81 (talk) 06:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Has now been fixed, I think. Gandalf61 (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
You are right —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.170.121.81 (talk) 07:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

## Linear time calculation algorithm

"Algorithm exists to generate automorphic number with linear complexity O(n) if n-1 number is known[1]"

This statement is true. Just check this program !

## 9 isn't prime

Currently under "Other radixes" it says "A prime radix (such as 2,3,4,5,7,8,9,11,13,16,17,...)". However, 9 and 16 are not prime (but it is still true that they only have trivial automorphic numbers) 184.12.106.188 (talk) 08:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Well spotted. It was a misunderstanding when shortening "Radixes which contain only one prime factor" in [2]. I have changed it to say "A prime power radix".[3] PrimeHunter (talk) 11:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)