This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ayvalık article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Turkey Mid‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Comments

Name

I beg all of you not to revert my Lesbos edit in parantheses; no matter what we -Turks- claim about its name, that island is known as Lesbos all over the world and our reverts will not change the truth. We will surely keep the Turkish name Midilli next to it. Thanks in advance. Smyrniot 18:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Objections!

In my opinion the history part of this article is not really objective. History is not presented in a neutral way. The ancient Greek and Byzantine history of the region are almost neglected (apart from the reference regarding the "Byzantine times"). Moreover there is much more to be written about the late history of Ayvalik (ancient Kydonies), more elements such as population figures could be added. I think that the "Turkish war of independence" should be changed to "Greco-Turkish War (1919-1922)". I will not do any other changes as I might be criticised as subjective because of the fact that I am Greek... Petros The Hellene 21:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion! Not Occupation!

Greek troops "occupied" Ayvalık to protect Greeks from the Turks? Which Turks? at least, %80 of the population remains Greek at that time. That was an invasion neglected attempt to realize the big ideal of Greeks of Greece carried out through 1919-1920. Asia Minor is a home of the Turks for one thousand years, Greeks invaded it in 1919, then Turks beat the Greeks and freed their homeland, so it can not be regarded as Greco-Turkic War. Am i wrong? I am a Turk whose grand grandparents slaughtered by Greeks and their lands,farms,homes also seized by Greeks in Manastır, only their small children was able to migrate Turkey.

Cezayirli Hasan Pasa was a genius. He was able to devastate almost hole Agean Fleet of Ottomans by his administrative prodigy !!!!!.... Awarded by Emperor, assigned as Grand Vezir !?#$%! Empire fell out like a paper castle in the begining of 20th century.. Its inevitable when you have a dumb grand vezir and dumbest emperor. AnatolianPars (talk) 16:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

omissions = propaganda

Aivali was ethnically cleansed of all indigenous Christian Greeks and Armenians by Turks in 1921-23. That fact, recorded by eyewitnesses, cannot be left out of the description of this town. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esparcadia (talk • contribs) 21:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greeks and Armenians are not indigenous to Anatolia, they are gypsy invaders from Caucasus. Also, there were no Armenians in Ayvalik. And Greeks left Ayvalik during the population exchange between Greece and Turkiye. Try better next time, gypsy Greek/Armenian. 88.242.51.185 (talk) 15:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Photography

The photo of the "Ayvalik Toast" is a disaster. It's not even similar. This is a "Croque-monsieur", instead of "Ayvalik Toast". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.242.44.97 (talk) 19:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ayvalık. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Altınova

Would be better to remove para on History of Altınova to a separate page about Altınova as doesn't really have much to do with rest of Ayvalık page. I am not able to start the new page myself. Anyone? Ealinggirl1954 (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]