Talk:Azazel in rabbinic literature

Djinn etc

There's something fishy about the article and the Encyclopedia entry it's hoiked from. The main problem I have is that it's inherently contradictory about what exactly Nachmanides' opinion was. I think that the source text includes a typo. Perhaps it should read that modern scholars diagree with Ibn Ezra / Nachmanides. I'm looking into the issue. --Dweller 14:27, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge this back into Azazel

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

all agreed then and merged back. Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this page is noteworthy or interesting enough to stand on its own, and could definitely be merged back into the Azazel article. This would also provide a good opportunity to fact-check it, rewrite it, and boil it down to its essentials to prevent the repetition of material between the Rabbinic Literature section and the rest of the Azazel article. Thoughts? --Makaristos (talk) 15:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge sounds good--Alpha166 (talk) 15:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, though someone actually needs to do the work.

The parent article is not exactly outstanding either.

People have supplied us with material worth working with, but work it needs. Alastair Haines (talk) 10:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.