Talk:BM-30 Smerch

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet / Cold War / Post-Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

Soviet Union

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Move to BM-30 ?

For standardization ? Bukvoed 19:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead! MarkV 05:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

There is a proposal here to move this article to a new name.--Patton^t/c 20:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why BM-30???

Who selected the BM-30 designator anyway? The name of the set is 9K58 and the launch vehicle is the 9A52. No one uses the name BM-30, certainly not the user countries. dendirrek (talk) 06:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The translated name is incorrect as well. It is "Tornado" (Смерч). Had it been "Whirlwind", it would be called "вихрь". Acorn897 (talk) 17:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia

Georgia has been added as an operator. The source is a supposed confidential Georgian MoD end user certificate (written in English!), posted at a georgian forum. I am not sure if this is a reliable source and whether what it claims is true. D2306 (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Operational history

The following statement is not supported by the link used for authority:

"It was also used by pro-Russian rebels or regular Russian troops against Ukrainian targets during the War in Donbass."

The Human Rights Watch article linked makes reference to evidence of Smerch rockets being fired against Lugansk City, which was under rebel control at the time. The evidence points to its use by Ukrainian government forces.

Another Human Rights Watch article^[1] makes reference to evidence of Smerch weapon systems being used by the Ukrainian government forces for the delivery of cluster munitions to Donetsk City. Again, the evidence is overwhelming that it was used by the Ukrainian side.

A search shows no neutral sources alleging use of Smerch weapon systems by the forces of Donetsk and Lugansk.

The misleading statement will be changed to reflect the actual information contained in the two Human Rights Watch articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.111.20.66 (talk) 04:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Ukraine: Widespread Use of Cluster Munitions". 2014-10-20.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BM-30 Smerch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130925080657/http://www.kanwa.com/dnws/showpl.php?id=626 to http://www.kanwa.com/dnws/showpl.php?id=626

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please add this information to A_100E section.

200+ units, produced locally as the A-100E with complete TOT, based on the Chinese A-100, which is in turn based on the Soviet BM-30. Humayun1997 (talk) 13:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on BM-30 Smerch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article started to be abused

I just reverted the edits that were made regarding 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in the operational history section. Some started to use this article to accuse either side in the conflict. Hammer5000 (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

another warhead in Kharkiv

This looks like non-separated, chute-retarded version - is this thermobaric? --Anidaat (talk) 15:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cluster of edits, a revert, and more edits - page preview problem solved.

There was a subtle problem in the infobox that was causing the page preview for this article (eg. what appears when you hover over this: BM-30 Smerch) to be corrupted; it was showing infobox source instead of the first few lines of article content. Since I cannot find a way to test page previews without publishing the changes, I had to publish a few changes that were just debugging or trying various ideas to identify the root of the problem. I did find and fix the problem, it was a bad value for the caliber parameter in the info box. If someone knows how to get page previews of not yet published edits, I would love to hear it. Page previews do not work in users' sandboxes, they only work in the main namespace. - Wikkiwonkk (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Ukraine: Widespread Use of Cluster Munitions". 2014-10-20.

[1]