Talk:Bab al-Nairab

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gate/Neighborhood[edit]

I've reverted Preacher lad's removal of information about the neighborhood. The gate, has given the name to the area around it (which is something very common in Syria - Bab Sharqi in Damascus, Bab al-Sebaa in Homs), and while it is conceivable that a separate article for each can exist, I think it's simply impractical and counter-intuitive in this case. There are very few RS that speak of Syria's local geography (or architecture, for the gate) to sufficiently populate these two articles (and subsequently make them eligible for a split). If split, as it is now, you'll be left with two articles that are underwhelming, less than detailed and less than comprehensive. Instead we can have one comprehensive article that covers the whole subject, especially considering how integral they are to each other (the gate, and the neighborhood). In addition, the relationship between the two is not all that ambiguous, and is sufficiently explained in the lead, so anyone reading the article would understand it well. Yazan (talk) 14:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I'm the one who's been writing about the neighborhood, naturally I agree with Yazan's reasoning. The article describes the chronological development of Bab al-Nairab from the original Ayyubid gate which marked the southward expansion of Aleppo to the historic and present-day quarter that developed around the gate which no longer exists. Speaking of which, although many of the sources agree that the gate no longer exists, none seem to say when. Therefore I've removed the bit about it being ruined during the Ottoman era. Until we get a reliable source, the article will just state something along the lines that Bab al-Nairab gate no longer exists. --Al Ameer son (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bab al-Nairab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:55, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]