Talk:Baby Huey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Baby Huey also was the nickname for a soul artist. See http://www.dustygroove.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dga/search.cgi?x=0&y=0&usersrch=baby+huey&issearch=yes

What is the best way to make this clear? Add a new subsection to this page, or start a new article and reference it from here? --81.83.71.19 18:37, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If the artist isn't very well known at all, a new subsection is in order. Otherwise, I say create a separate article with a disambigiation notice at the top of this page. Jeff Silvers 05:54, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Added a disambiguation link to James Ramey at the top. --Lph 20:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To me, the reference to the "famous graduate student" and the request to sign a thesis (as well as the photograph) appear to be an inside joke. Not appropriate for Wikipedia. Realdiamonds 18:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional Geese?[edit]

Baby Huey is a duck. Why is he in the 'Fictional geese' category? Lou Sander (talk) 12:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two years later this article is in both categories Fictional ducks and Fictional geese. Are there any fictional geese associated with Baby Huey?
Compare "The Ugly Duckling": in neither of those two Fictional birds subcategories, which reveals a strict interpretation. That "duckling" is a cygnet (bird) but its story does feature ducks and/or geese. --P64 (talk) 04:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hairstyle?[edit]

Of this paragraph:

"Baby Huey's hairstyle inspired a surge of tiny bangs on men in the 1950s and 1960s. It is thought that Baby Huey's hairstyle was actually inspired by Moe of the Three Stooges. Baby Huey's influence on coiffure can be seen around the world."

only the middle sentence can possibly be considered accurate. Clearly someone is messing around here, and seeing how long they can get away with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.191.166.202 (talk) 23:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The main problem here is that the article is written by a person or persons without coherent writing ability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.68.134.1 (talk) 19:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]