Talk:Bad Science (Goldacre book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2009 & 2010 comments[edit]

Can we please start making a list of references (books, journal articles, newspaper articles, etc.) that are cited by the book? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Walrabbit (talk • contribs) 21:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cited by the book? There are 13 pages of them! Jhbuk (talk) 18:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Querying Cleanup Notices[edit]

The anonymous contributer who added the cleanup templates could help by providing some hints describing his / her concerns. Recent Runes (talk) 18:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This needs a cleanup to condense[edit]

I would like to clean up this page, particularly to condense the chapter summary. i appreciate the additions of chapter synopses, but it’s an article about the book..it should discuss ideas, themes, reception, similar works etc. Creating a chapter summary for each and every chapter is kind of a spoiler alert too. Not what Wikipedia is about. AdamTSWiki (talk) 12:08, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]