Talk:Bangiales

A fact from Bangiales appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Bangiales, an order of red algae, contains both the oldest-known sexually reproducing organism and the seaweed used to make sushi wrappers?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bangiales.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Bangiales is an order of red algae that contains both the oldest sexually reproducing organism and nori? Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S108495212200129X?via%3Dihub#preview-section-snippets
ALT1: ... that Bangiales, an order of red algae, contains both the oldest known sexually reproducing organism and the seaweed used to make sushi wrappers?
- Reviewed: My first DYK, so no QPQ is needed

5x expanded by 2003 LN6 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bangiales; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

article is long enough, recently expanded and within policy. The hook is interesting and short enough, but I think it needs a little rewording. Bangiales doesn't contain nori, it is used to make nori. Maybe the addition of "is used to make" would clarify things. QPQ not needed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added an alternate hook that conforms to these standards. Thank you for your review. 2003 LN 6 14:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

for ALT1. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]