Talk:Battle of Zliten

Africa: Libya Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libya (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: African Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force

Untitled[edit]

An unembedded journalist account of the massacre of Majer: 85 people massacred by NATO http://rolandotelesur.blogspot.com/2011/08/la-masacre-de-majer.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.190.29 (talk) 20:37, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The former Libyan regime's claim has already been noted in the paragraph. There is no need to include you POV-pushing statement and definitely not in bold letters. Keep the article neutral. Fovezer (talk) 22:24, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

85 people massacred in their sleep by NATO cannot be brushed aside as not 'neutral'. People who look at this article at least can get an independent account of events by non-US media. Here are more details for war crimes by NATO, as well as the Majer massacre by a French international lawyer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUBJcfaZGNc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.133.8.226 (talk) 23:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No one is brushing aside the claim. It is clearly covered in the article. However, the language you are using is incredibly loaded and denotes bias, and therefore does not meet Wikipedia standards. First, you need WP:RS for your claims. Blogs and youtube videos are not reliable sources. Second, "massacre" implies an intentional act. Even if the former regimes claims are true, which haven't been independently verified, you'd have to show those people were intentionally targeted and not collateral damage. Please see WP:NPOV for more info about this. Fovezer (talk) 01:45, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Majer[edit]

Footage of the event and footage of the dead/dying and injured may be found with a quick search on youtube, people DID die that much is known. You can't use Youtube as a reference here but there you have it. -- Secondat of Orange (talk) 03:47, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Zliten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812035932/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41960775/ to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41960775

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]