Talk:Berkoff (surname)
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. Note I did add a hat note to Steven Berkoff. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Berkoff (disambiguation) → Berkoff — Relisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC) The current page Berkoff is a redirect to the actor Steven Berkoff. It is according to the page view statistics rarely used. If moved, the address Berkoff (disambiguation) can be deleted. For this I need help. Kind regards, --Berkh (talk) 06:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Berkoff (disambiguation) is not even really a dab page. It's a surname page (I'll update the tags). Station1 (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose: The google test, which is a reliable method of determining primary, is overwhelmingly in favour of a non-move--Hutcher (talk) 03:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Remark The page of Abraham Lincoln for instance does not use the primary Lincoln page. There you can find an extensive disambiguation page. With a google test you will only find Abraham Lincolns Wikipedia page, and none of the others. If there is a disambiguation page at the primary page you find in the Google results quite often however the most visited page with the name somewhere and below the disambiguation page. For example Washingon. Kind regards, --Berkh (talk) 07:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. By far the most famous person by that name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Remark Absolutely right. But that is no reason to make it unnecessary difficult to find other people with the name. Compare the above example of Lincoln. At the moment the target page is only a redirect. Kind regards, --Berkh (talk) 10:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.