Talk:Best Party

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Iceland Mid‑importance

	Iceland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

Losers? I'm skeptical.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 13:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Besti flokkurinn → ~~Best Party (Iceland)~~ Best Party — Seems to be form being used by the English-language press. (BBC, Wall Street Journal, BusinessWeek) 84.92.117.93 (talk) 20:30, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support a move to Best Party. The only other similarly named entity, the Best Party of Hawaii can be disambiguated with a hatnote. — AjaxSmack 02:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support move, Best Party is the name the English language press uses and there is no need for the (Iceland) as per AjaxSmack. Davewild (talk) 07:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Modified the move request to Best Party without the "(Iceland)" disambiguation per above comments. 84.92.117.93 (talk) 20:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support as this seems reasonable enough. ISD (talk) 06:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

SERIOUS Improvements Needed!

Why are the political positions numbered and listed in fragmented sentences? They're unsourced, and many of them make it seem like this is a "joke" party - the entire thing needs to be factchecked and sourced. Did the real party actually brag about lying to and manipulating people with free towels in their official political positions? I'm not from Iceland (I got to this page due to the Wikipedia Effect), but this entire section seems unsourced at best, and completely fictitious at worst. ABarnes94 (talk) 17:38, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The party is led by a comedian, and those numbered items are their official Party platform (See [1], and their official site). I suggest watching this. :)

Yes, they officially stated that they would promise undeliverable things, because that is what politicians do.

That said, yes I agree that the article could be tightened up a little, and expanded a lot. Please feel free to help do so. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 18:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Best Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100420062450/http://bestiflokkurinn.is:80/um-flokkinn/stefnumal to http://bestiflokkurinn.is/um-flokkinn/stefnumal

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Best Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]